CLINICAL CASES

22-year-old patient, preoperative and postoperative (7 months) views after subfascial breast augmentation with Mentor 330 cc anatomical implants:

 

22-year-old patient, preoperative and postoperative (2 months) views after subfascial breast augmentation with Mentor 350 cc anatomical implants:

 

24-year-old patient, preoperative and postoperative (6 months) views after subfascial breast augmentation with Mentor 175 cc round implants:

 

25-year-old patient, preoperative and postoperative (6 months) views after subfascial breast augmentation with Mentor 200 cc round implants:

 

23-year-old patient, preoperative and postoperative (6 months) views after subfascial breast augmentation with Mentor 275 cc round implants:

32-year-old patient, preoperative and postoperative (8 months) views after subfascial breast augmentation with Mentor 275 cc round implants:

28-year-old patient, preoperative and postoperative (4 months) views after subfascial breast augmentation with Mentor 225 cc round implants:

21-year-old patient, preoperative and postoperative (6 weeks) views after subfascial breast augmentation with Mentor 350 cc round implants:

27-year-old patient, preoperative and postoperative (3 months) views after subfascial breast augmentation with Mentor 300 cc anatomical implants:

33-year-old patient, preoperative and postoperative (6 months) views after subfascial breast augmentation with Mentor 300 cc anatomical implants:

29-year-old patient, preoperative and postoperative (5 months) views after subfascial breast augmentation with Mentor 380 cc anatomical implants:

 

Article published in „Advantages and outcomes in subfascial breast augmentation: a two- year review of experience“- Aesthetic Plastic Surgery vol. 32, no. 3, May 2008, pag. 426 - 431 – Springer, New York (Official journal of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery ISAPS); author Horia Siclovan.

(A–C) Preoperative frontal and oblique views of a 22-year-old patient.

(D–F) Postoperative views after breast augmentation with 225-cc anatomical implants (Mentor CPG™) medium height, high profile in the subfascial plane; result after six months.

 

(A–C) Preoperative frontal and oblique views of a 51-year-old patient.

(D–F) Postoperative views after breast augmentation with 260-cc anatomical implants (Mentor CPG™) medium height, high profile in the subfascial plane; result after six months.

(A–C) Preoperative frontal and oblique views of a 33-year-old patient.

(D–F) Postoperative views after breast augmentation with 300-cc anatomical implants (Mentor CPG™) medium height, high profile in the subfascial plane; result after six months.

(A–C) Preoperative frontal and lateral views of a 30-year-old patient.

(D–F) Postoperative views after subglandular breast augmentation with 250-cc round implants high profile result after one year.

(G–I) Postoperative views after placement of new 300-cc anatomical implants (Mentor CPG™) medium height, high profile were placed in the subfascial plane; result after eight months